The press and the president-elect

BitDepth#1484

Mark Lyndersay

ON TUESDAY, Donald Trump was elected as the next president of the US.

The 45th US president will return as the 47th, returning Trump to leadership of a major economic and military power.

Trump has openly declared his contempt for all traditional media houses, mostly sparing the unremittingly conservative Fox News, but despite having chosen to connect with his followers on his own micro-blogging service, Truth Social, he remains vigilant about how he is portrayed in print and television.

Trump is a man of both worlds, having starred on the reality show The Apprentice after carefully managing his public persona over decades in traditional media stories.

A sustained attack could not come at a worse time for mainstream media, already destabilised by the confidence lost by the older, conservative elements of its core audience and a lack of interest from a generation raised on participation media.

In the US, the confidence of that audience plummeted dramatically after both the Washington Post and the LA Times announced that they would not endorse a candidate for president.

Both newspapers are owned by billionaires, the Times by Dr Patrick Soon-Shiong, who was accused of refusing to allow the editorial board to endorse Kamala Harris, and WaPo, owned by Jeff Bezos.

The LA Times lost 18,000 subscribers, 4.5 per cent of its paid readership, three of its leader writers and the paper’s editorials editor, Mariel Garza, following the decision, while the Post lost 250,000 subscribers, ten per cent of its paid users after Bezos published a skittish rationale for its decision.

In an op-ed published in the Post, Bezos wrote: “Our profession is now the least trusted of all. Something we are doing is clearly not working.”

In response, David Simon, creator of The Wire and a former reporter, wrote on X about his reasons for cancelling his WaPo subscription: “If this technobrat oligarch ever releases his grip on what needs to be an independent newsroom and editorial board, indifferent to the financial positions of its publisher, then I’ll return.”

Beyond the president-elect’s often-expressed intent to retaliate against journalists he believes are unfairly attacking him is the agenda of Project 2025, a document created by the Heritage Foundation think tank as the template for an incoming conservative government.

The plan includes a strategy to rein in two notable targets, VOA and Tik Tok. Project 2025 advocates moving the US Agency for Global Media – “the oversight body for Voice of America” – from congressional oversight and placing it under the National Security Council.

Banning Tik Tok, described as a serious and unacceptable foreign-based influence and a source for data for training Chinese artificial intelligence, is also part of the plan.

Amendments to laws limiting the seizure of journalists’ e-mails and phone records are also on its agenda.

The Project 2025 plans for section 230, an article of US law governing responsibility for online commentary, are equally expansive, some of which are sensible but others have the potential to bring a chilling effect to free speech.

Trump sued the Pulitzer board in 2022 for awarding prizes to the New York Times and Washington Post for their reporting on his ties to Russia.

In 2023, he suggested that NBC should be tried for treason for reporting its coverage of his criminal trials. After his debate with Kamala Harris in September, he appeared on Fox & Friends to suggest that ABC should have its licence revoked for fact-checking his statements.

“It was three to one,” he argued.

Project 2025 and the president-elect’s ire are not necessarily an agenda, and it’s unclear how much residual media-related resentment will colour his second presidency, but regional media should be concerned.

Much of journalistic practice is accomplished through a mix of legislative freedoms and an acceptance of the craft as delivering a common good.

When a former and future American president makes it clear that he considers independent reporting to be a nuisance and eminently disposable, when billionaire owners are allowed (if Project 2025 planners have their way) new freedoms to acquire media houses like party favours, when competitive viral falsehoods scuttle efforts at reporting fact, a dangerous example is set.

Trump’s approach to the media is likely to prove instructive to many globally, offering them a licence for ill. And it’s not as if TT has any shortage of elected leaders who have publicly and privately demonstrated a short fuse with the media’s ambit.

For most of our lifetimes, as goes America, so goes the region has been the expectation. Journalists must prepare to resist that tide.

Mark Lyndersay is the editor of technewstt.com. An expanded version of this column can be found there

The post The press and the president-elect appeared first on Trinidad and Tobago Newsday.